<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>remote usability testing &#8211; Loop11</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.loop11.com/tag/remote-usability-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.loop11.com</link>
	<description>Easiest Online Usability Testing Tool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 01:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Airline Website Usability: British Airways Soars Ahead!</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/through-the-loop-case-study-airline-website-usability/</link>
					<comments>https://www.loop11.com/through-the-loop-case-study-airline-website-usability/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website usability testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/blog/?p=91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A recent study to rate the usability for the world's leading Airline websites, showed that the British Airways website is far and above the most user friendly website.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.loop11.com/through-the-loop-case-study-airline-website-usability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">91</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarking, User Testing &#038; Websites</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/benchmarking-user-testing-websites/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Newton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmoderated testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux benchmark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=8721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is one of the world’s leading independent organisations for medical humanitarian aid. Every year nearly two hundred Australians and New Zealanders are sent to and supported in the field by Médecins Sans Frontières Australia. MSF ran a Loop11 study on https://www.msf.org.au/ to collate visitor feedback and form benchmarks on their existing website [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8721</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many participants should be used for online, quantitative usability testing?</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/how-many-participants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Loop11 Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=4977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How many participants should be used for Online, Quantitative Usability Testing? Qualitative usability testing has traditionally been based around small sample sizes of 5-20 participants. However, the growth of online testing tools and quantitative usability research is changing the game. Whist many experts agreed that for qualitative, lab-based testing small samples sizes of 5-20 participants [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4977</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything You Need to Know About A/B Testing</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-a-b-testing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby Biddle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Loop11 Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/B testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote ux testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=12431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A/B or split testing is one of the best ways to track your results. The concept is quite simple: test one variable against another. There are countless applications for A/B testing, whether you&#8217;re comparing variables in an ad, features on an app, your website&#8217;s layout, or anything else. In this guide, we&#8217;ll be sharing everything [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12431</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competitive Benchmarking: The Art of UX Espionage</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/competitive-benchmarking-the-art-of-ux-espionage/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Newton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmoderated testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=9078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For many companies, competitive benchmarking is a foray into the world of espionage. Being able to see which elements of your competitor’s website are working, and which are not, can be a revelation. One of Loop11’s great features is the ability to run user testing on practically any website. It was this ability which Loop11 [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9078</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits of Online, Unmoderated User Testing</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/benefits-of-online-unmoderated-user-testing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Newton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[How To Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmoderated testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website usability testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=8479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For most usability professionals lab-based research has been the only testing method they’d consider.  However, with the growth of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 technologies online, unmoderated user testing (also known as remote unmoderated or asynchronous user testing) is gaining traction and being used not only as a compliment to, but in many cases as [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8479</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loop11 &#8211; A look back at 2011</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/2011-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Loop11 Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmoderated testing tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=4879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[2011 was a big year, not just for world despots, but for Loop11 too. Whilst global dictators everywhere fell to revolutions, Loop11 contributed its part to the remote, unmoderated usability testing revolution. As revealed in the recent UPA biennial survey the use of remote unmoderated testing grew by 28%. Our own usage statistics also show [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4879</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote, Unmoderated UX Testing Grows by 28%</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/remote-testing-grows/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmoderated user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing tool]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=4414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jeff Sauro at Measuring Usability, has put together another great blog post comparing preferred methods of usability testing by usability professionals over the past six years. Based on the last three biennial UPA surveys, Jeff determined that there was a 28% increase in people using remote, unmoderated usability testing tools like Loop11. Jeff states that [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4414</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which City Council has the best website?</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/council-websites/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitor usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEBSITE USABILITY]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=3341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We took six of Australia’s capital city councils and tested the usability of their websites. You'll be surprised by which council came out on top.]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3341</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Shout Out for Multilingual Usability Testing</title>
		<link>https://www.loop11.com/multilingual-ux-testing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Loop11 Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International ux testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multilingual user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.80.240.189/?p=4621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As you are reading this, dozens of our clients are running remote usability studies in an array of different languages. In the 2 years that Loop11 has operated, clients have run all sorts of usability tests in over 20 languages. Some of our clients in fact conduct the exact same test in multiple languages, which [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4621</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
